A proposed House policy bill would slash the number of F-35 Joint Strike Fighters the Pentagon would buy in fiscal 2025 as lawmakersâ patience with the program and manufacturer Lockheed Martin wears thin.
The Pentagonâs proposed FY25 budget called for buying 68 of the fifth-generation fighter â 42 F-35As for the Air Force, plus 13 F-35Bs and 13 F-35Cs for the Navy and Marine Corps.
But the chairmanâs mark of the House Armed Services Committeeâs proposed FY25 National Defense Authorization Act would first cut that purchase to 58 jets. On top of that, the Pentagon would not be allowed to accept delivery of 10 of those jets until the defense secretary certifies to lawmakers that several problems with the F-35 are fixed.
That means that at least at first, the Pentagon would only receive 48 jets in all next year.
In a background briefing with reporters, a senior staff member for the committeeâs Republican majority expressed displeasure with the F-35 program and Lockheed Martin. The Pentagon has halted deliveries of the newest F-35s while Lockheed sorts out problems with its Technology Refresh 3 upgrades. An undisclosed number of jets are now sitting at the companyâs facility in Fort Worth, Texas.
âOver the last couple of years, our members have grown frustrated with the F-35 program,â the Republican staffer said. âThis year, we are struggling with accepting airplanes from Lockheed Martin when they come off the line. So our members wanted to address that because if you have an aircraft come off [the production line and] weâre not accepting delivery, whatâs the point? Theyâre just paperweights at that point.â
When asked for comment, Lockheed Martin wrote in an email to Defense News: âWe look forward to working with the administration and the Congress as the presidentâs fiscal year 2025 budget receives full consideration in the months ahead.â
TR-3 is the name of a batch of upgrades to the F-35â²s software and hardware, including improved displays, computer memory and processing power, which will lay the foundation for a more extensive series of upgrades known as Block 4.
But problems with TR-3â²s software, as well as delays in production on some key components, have kept the newest F-35s from working properly. TR-3 is now more than a year overdue, and deliveries may not resume until the third quarter of 2024. Even when delivery begins for the jets featuring TR-3, which could happen this year, they wonât be ready for combat until 2025.
Another senior staffer for the committeeâs Democrats said lawmakers want to see the F-35 program succeed and that the Pentagon sorely needs the jet. But the problems with TR-3 have to be sorted through so the Block 4 upgrades â which will include the ability to carry more weapons and better electronic warfare capabilities â can follow, he added.
The Republican staffer said cutting the initial 10 F-35s from the procurement plan would save roughly $1 billion, which could then be reinvested into the program to ensure they work properly when they roll out of the factory and are delivered to the military.
He highlighted the jetsâ software issues and radar problems as items that must be fixed, noting it would be better to buy fewer jets to ensure the ones that are delivered work properly and arenât left sitting in Fort Worth.
âThatâs better for the long-term health of the platform,â the Republican staffer said.
The Republican staffer added that the withholding of 10 more jetsâ deliveries would prod the Pentagon to deliver plans to fix the aircraftâs problems, and encourage acquisition strategies that would improve issues found throughout the F-35 program.
The Republican staffer said the report on the F-35â²s initial operational test and evaluation phase had several recommendations for things that need fixed with the jet, and that these reports should help provide a way forward.
âWeâre doing a number of things to try and mitigate some problems that the F-35 is having in production so that it gets to the warfighter sooner,â the Republican staffer said.
Stephen Losey is the air warfare reporter for Defense News. He previously covered leadership and personnel issues at Air Force Times, and the Pentagon, special operations and air warfare at Military.com. He has traveled to the Middle East to cover U.S. Air Force operations.
Source Agencies