“This process uncovered a shortcoming in the SRU Operations Manual in that no single reference source is specified for determining player points.”
SRU will now base all player points only Opta data, Watkins said.
It was also determined Fifita’s input in the last 12 minutes of the win over Souths had not impacted the result and the club had not gone over the 100 points in other games.
Shute Shield captains at the season launch.Credit: Karen Watson/Sydney Rugby
The decision is at odds with SRU’s strong response to a similar breach by Sydney University’s first grade colts team last year, who went over their 40-point limit by a single point for the last 11 minutes in a 57-27 semi-final win. In a letter seen by this masthead, the SRU also found the breach did not impact the result, was due to “inadvertent human error” by a Uni official and “there was no intent to exploit the PP rules”.
But Sydney Uni were still hit with a $1000 fine and had their first grade colts points limit reduced to 35 points for the entire 2024 season.
Watkins declined to comment on Tuesday but Easts chief executive Dom Remond explained the error had come after new coach Ben Batger reviewed all player points and re-graded Fifita based on evidence he had only played four Tests, not five.
“Unfortunately there were varying sources of information and we used those as a base to reclassify, which was accepted. Post that, there was a discussion to say there is now going to be a single source, which is Opta, and based on that data he was reclassified back to the points he had previously,” Remond said.
“The SRU had addressed it all. I am sure some clubs are unhappy with it, but we weren’t in the wrong because we used credible sources to classify him. We wouldn’t field a team that is over the 100 points.”
Rival clubs are not happy with SRU’s decision to not penalise Easts for the proven breach, however, particularly after Gordon were stripped of two points in round 11 for fielding a player, Ola Tauelangi, who had not been officially cleared to play after returning from Moana Pasifika.
In a letter sent to Watkins by Gordon president Matthew Glascott on Monday night, which was seen by this masthead, the SRU were accused of using double standards.
“I am having trouble understanding the logic in not penalising Easts for breaching the player points for (the) game against Souths,” Glascott wrote.
Loading
“Has Easts breached the player points? It’s either YES or NO. Why is SRU making excuses for a club when Gordon breached a registration policy and were deducted two points for playing a player for the last 20 min of a game. Even though he has been with the club for 4 years, was cleared by his Super rugby club but did not obtain international clearance until Monday morning. How is this breach more serious than that of Easts? We are having great difficulty accepting the lack of fairness and consistency.”
Glascott declined to comment further on Tuesday.
Rival clubs are also concerned about other players at Easts being incorrectly classified. A message group of disgruntled club officials has discussed withholding Catchpole Medal votes for the remaining four rounds as a protest, according to sources who declined to comment due to the private nature of the discussions.
In his letter to club bosses, Watkins said all breaches are considered on a case-by-case basis and the SRU “determines sanctions in what we believe are in the overall interests of Premiership Rugby and fairness”.
Easts escaped a sanction earlier in the year after West Harbour players complained they were victims of racial abuse in a trial at Woollahra Oval. An SRU code of conduct hearing determined the abuse had occurred, but there was insufficient evidence it had come from Easts supporters.
Source Agencies
